On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 07:40:52PM -0700, Andrey Filippov wrote: > Is there another way to flash the 353 without using NFS? > Thanks, > > -------------------------------------------------- > Rock > > Rock, > > no, there is none - we've never wrote alternative code. What kind of > problems do you have with NFS?
None really, I just wanted to see if there was a way to use SSHFS instead. I have a natural aversion to NFS after years of using it :) But SSHFS would have to be compiled (with FUSE as well) into the camera, unless I could reverse mount the camera to my system, so that might be more trouble that just using NFS. SSHFS would be convenient though because most of us already have SSHD running on everything, and its secure as well. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- BTW, I just got my camera up and it works fine. I see these physical filesystems: Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/root 24576 15448 9128 63% / /dev/part/rwfsblock 81920 13664 68256 17% /mnt/flash The flash folder is populated with what appears to be configuration data: ls -al /mnt/flash/ drwxr-xr-x 17 root root 0 Nov 22 15:48 etc drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 0 Nov 10 16:46 html drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 0 Nov 12 01:14 local drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 Nov 12 01:14 root Nothing to do now. I'm just reporting my first findings. Thanks, ----------------- -Rock _______________________________________________ Support-list mailing list [email protected] http://support.elphel.com/mailman/listinfo/support-list_support.elphel.com
