Hi Guys! Excellent photos and I am sure you all enjoyed the experience (especially of lugging a man-mounted-ray-gun around to the amazement of other hikers).
Looking at how the Elphel-Eyesis unit is mounted to the back pack, and the angle of incline relative to the ground and the hiker's back - I wonder would it not be advantages to have the following added to the overall project (I not sure this may have been mention before or not - Apologies if it has). 1> S/W to handle the low level (possibly medium impact) vibration(s) and varying degree of perpendicular given; the walking steps of a heavy backpack unit; probably a sore and unsteady transport (i.e.: Further s/w evaluation as was carried out on the truck / Sports Utility vehicle movement and picture quality) and variations over different transporters. 2> As the distance travelled by a human is vastly smaller over time than a vehicle, a mechanism to reduce the frequency of shots taken (That is: the multiple number of shots containing >50% the same scene.) This way, the quantity of cached images will be less, but as they carry more that 50% of sequential differentiated images, s/w be able to resolve any mismatch issues with the auto panorama s/w. 3> Be nice to have the hikers health (breathing, heart rate, etc) recorded so that one could give a "order of merit" / recognition of the efforts undertaken in capturing such panoramic images :) Grahame. _______________________________________________ Support-list mailing list [email protected] http://support.elphel.com/mailman/listinfo/support-list_support.elphel.com
