Well sheesh.  Maybe all I needed to do was email you. The device did show
up in /proc/asound/cards.  Aplay didn't show anything since it's an arecord
device only.  I got it working and have nice sound transport over the
network now.  This should work great.

Hopefully we can get the 393's revisited in the next vehicle iteration.
I've been recoding our control interface and am interested in porting your
new 393 JP4 javascript code.  We've wanted a better way to try raw mode for
a while.

Thanks for the response today,

On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 7:28 PM Elphel Support <
support-list@support.elphel.com> wrote:

> David,
> Axis ETRAX processor did have some USB problems, so it all needs testing.
> And as you know it was 2.6.19 kernel, so some new devices may be not
> supported.
> I haven't used 353 for quite some time, maybe Oleg knows more. But
> basically - just try a few cheap microphones and see which works.
> We now use 393 camera that has standard USB-2 that should not have any
> such problems.
> Andrey
> ---- On Sat, 03 Nov 2018 16:40:05 -0700 *David McPike
> <davidmcp...@gmail.com <davidmcp...@gmail.com>>* wrote ----
> Hey All,
> Long time no talk!  The SCINI ROV is back and currently being assembled
> for a new field season in Antarctica.  Bob asked me to look for a small mic
> that we could fit inside the ROV to listen to various device activity
> indicators (motors, clicks, etc.).  It looks like most of the links on the
> Audio elphel wiki page are either discontinued products, or not really good
> for an embedded use case.
> I tried this small mic ages ago but couldn't get it to work:
> https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01D9TBSAY/ref=oh_aui_search_detailpage?ie=UTF8&psc=1
> usb 1-1.2: new full speed USB device using crisv32_hc and address 8
> usb 1-1.2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
> [root@Elphel353 /root]13814# aplay -l
> **** List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices ****
> [root@Elphel353 /root]13814#
> Any way you could speed me up with suggestions for a USB mic with a
> supported chipset on the Elphel 353 kernel that would meet these physical
> specs?
> a small usb device up to a 1", 1.5" long is *maybe OK* but getting tough,
> a little bit wider may also be OK
> Thanks for any pointers!  Totally appreciate it.
> Best,
> David
> _______________________________________________
> Support-list mailing list
> Support-list@support.elphel.com
> http://support.elphel.com/mailman/listinfo/support-list_support.elphel.com
Support-list mailing list

Reply via email to