On 12/15/2008 06:05 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
> NoOp wrote:

>>> Along these lines, this might be of interest to try with SeaMonkey...
>>>
>>> http://www.info-svc.com/news/2008/12-12/
>>> [Google Chrome Receives Lowest Password Security Score]
>>>   http://www.info-svc.com/news/2008/12-12/pm-evaluator/
>>> [Password Manager Evaluator v2.0]
>>>
>>> If I get some time later I'll try it with SM 1.1.14 and 2.0a3pre to see
>>> what the results are.
>>>
>> 
>> 1.1.14:
>> Report
>> Test Performed       Result
>> Action Authority Checked on Retrieval        FAILED
>> Action Authority Checked on Save     FAILED
>> Action Authority Raises Warnings     FAILED
>> Action Path Checked on Retrieval     FAILED
>> Action Path Checked on Save  FAILED
>> Action Scheme Checked on Retrieval   FAILED
>> Action Scheme Checked on Save        FAILED
>> Action Scheme Raises Warnings        FAILED
>> Action Scheme Prevented if Unsafe    FAILED
>> Autocomplete=Off Prevents Form Fills         FAILED
>> Invisiblility Prevents Form Fills    PASSED
>> Method Checked on Retrieval  FAILED
>> Method Raises Warnings       FAILED
>> Multiple Paths Per User Per Authority        FAILED
>> Multiple Ports Per User Per Host     FAILED
>> Multi. Schemes Per User Per Authority        FAILED
>> Page Path Checked on Retrieval       FAILED
>> Random Name Attr. Prevents Form Fills        PASSED
>> User Required for PW Retrieval       FAILED
>> User Required for PW Save    FAILED
>> Valid URIs Don't Break Anything      PASSED
>> 
>> I reckon I'll run the test again to make sure that I did everything
>> correct.
> 
> Does FAILED mean good or bad ?

http://www.info-svc.com/news/2008/12-12/

_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to