>>Thorsten Dorr wrote:
>>>I always get this pop-up message
>>>when I try to connect to my IMAP account:
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>| Sicherheitsfehler: Domainnamen stimmen nicht �... |
>>>Sie haben versucht, eine Verbindung mit "imap.xxxx.de" aufzubauen.
>>>Allerdings geh�rt das "vorgezeigte" Sicherheitszertifikat
>>>"mail44.ispgateway.de". Es ist m�glich, aber unwahrscheinlich, dass
>>>jemand versucht, Ihre Kommunikation mit dieser Website abzufangen.
>>>
>>>Wenn Sie vermuten, dass das angezeigte Zertifikat nicht
>>>"imap.xxxx.de" geh�rt, unterbrechen Sie bitte die Verbindung und
>>>benachrichtigen Sie den Administrator der Site.
>>>
>>>[ Zertifikat ansehen ] [ OK ] [ Abbrechen ] [ Hilfe ]
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>I know that the server is right and secure
>>>I have imported the certificates for "smtprelaypool.ispgateway.de" and
>>>"sslmailpool.ispgateway.de" and set them trustfull for "web" and
>>>"mail-user"
>>>
>>>How can I deactivate this message?
>>>
Ray_Net wrote:
>Nobody can help this guy ?
>Is it or is it not a SM problem ?

Google-translated:
>>>| Security Error: Domain names do not ... |
>>>You tried to connect with "imap.xxxx.de" build.
>>>However gehrt the "vorgezeigte" security certificate
>>>"mail44.ispgateway.de". It is possible, but unlikely that
>>>someone tries to your communication with this site be obtained.
>>>
>>>If you suspect that the certificate is not displayed
>>>"imap.xxxx.de" gehrt, please break the connection and
>>>notify the administrator of the site.
>>>
>>>[View Certificate] [OK] [Cancel] [Help]

There was a great deal of chatter last Summer at Slashdot
about the hysterical way (NOT meaning "funny")
that Gecko (Firefox 3) handles Secure Sockets Layer certificates:

http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:0bLQZEr0cJ8J:tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/08/04/0058217+*-website-*-using-*-self-signed-*.*.*.*.*-*.*-*.*+*-*-bundle-*-*-*-*-*+migrate-away-*-*.*-*+hey-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*+*-pretending+*-*-little-sense+not-just-*-paying-customers+*-*-*-*-*-*-*.*.*.*.*.*-*.and-no-certificate+*-click-four-times-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*+*-*-almost-useless-*-*-*-*+inc+inc+inc+looks.MORE.scary.and.LESS.secure#24465811

http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:PXOl-z9wwDMJ:tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/08/22/1139236+*-third+default+*-*-*-*-*-only-once+changed+dump-responsibility-*-*-*-*-*+*-*-myth+*-*-vanilla-*+*-*-*-*-*-exception+*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*.pack+fraudelently+encrypted-but-*.*-*+CACert+routers+red+unencrypted.AND+*-Explorer-*+*-*.eavesdropping+*-*-educated-*-*-*-*-*-*+authenticated+Conditioning+yellow+beyond+green+*-sniffers+PITA+permission+*-*-difference+unauthenticated#24704051

http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/08/25/1545246&mode=nested&threshold=5#24739559
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/08/25/1545246&mode=nested&threshold=5#24739447

The whole
**Certificate Authorities aren't worth the powder to blow them to
Hell**
thing came up again last month:
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:7D0Rfav_m4IJ:it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/12/23/0046258+who-certifies-*-*+rss+self-signed-certs-aren't-*-more-risky+forged.certificates+no.questions-*+*-*-*-*-dozens-*-*-*-*-*-*+perfect+Mozilla-and-friends-aren't-*-*-*-*-*-*-*+removed+*-*-*-*-*-should-never-*-*-*-*+*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-song-*-*-*+*-*-*-add-*-remove-*-*-*+inc+PositiveSSL+Comodo+IE#26210795
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to