JeffM schrieb: >> > Noting the Subject line of the thread, > it's also interesting to note how Windoze *trains* its users > to want to IGNORE security warnings > (so they can more easily get their already-fragile systems infected).
In this special case it is not Windows which *trains* me to deactivate this "security warning". It's Seamonkey. Because it tells me everytime when I connect to my email-account (sending/receiving) the same thing which I still know and which I have accepted as "not a security problem" for me. (I'm really more concerned about the problem that my email-login-pw is sent unencrypted because I cannot activate [ ] Save Authentication because the emailserver is not accepting this.) By the way the complete way how all certificate things are provided to the user (email, OpenGPG/Enigmail, otr etc) is sooooo complete non-understandable to 99,9% of the user that it is in my opinion completely useless because the user cannot verify if a warning is important or not. The user-interface for all this security things would need a much more user-friendly design. Thorsten. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
