OldCroc wrote:
With all the problems that too many seasoned users, of SeaMonkey,are having, is it possible that the "Final" release of version 2.0 was released PREMATURELY?? Yes, there are many satisfied users, also, but there ARE too many who are NOT and the attitude of the developers should be to listen to the users, and try to rectify Version 2.0 OR WITHDRAW IT UNTIL IT REALLY IS READY!!!
Considering most of the "satisfied" users never show up in a support newsgroup, it's hard to believe that the people having problems outnumber those who are satisfied with this release.
I have read where it is said that the old code was not usable anymore, or could Not be corrected, but it seems to me, that Version 2.0 IS NO BETTER! WHY DID THE DEVELOPERS COMPLETELY IGNORE WHAT THE USERS WERE SAYING ALL ALONG, AND THEN DEVELOP A LIMPING NOT-READY FOR PRIME TIME VERSION, ANYWAY?
Where did this "developers completely ignore what the users were saying all along" come from? From Beta 1, nothing I posted about was ignored. What have you been complaining about "all along" that's been ignored? There are always problems with any update, and most people are willing to post enough information about *what is happening* on their system to find a solution or workaround. If you're just unhappy with programming differences/changes, I don't feel like complaining about a FREE suite that does most everything I want, to which I CONTRIBUTE NOTHING. Sorry you don't feel the same... but I don't want the developers to think their work/efforts have not been appreciated by most of us. bj _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
