Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
James wrote:
Hi, Paul. Please see comments below...
[snip]
Hi, Paul. I told you I would let you know when I find another example
of the apparent random application of light or dark text and here it
is. I'm including the entire message, which is totally light gray text
[header and all; completely light type] in case you might pick up some
clue as to why it should all be light. Or not. Here's the post:
[snip]
End of quote. While in the digest ALL of the text above is light type
here in my composer it's all dark type. Why would it be all light type
in 2.0?
In addition the next message [number 3] in the digest [which happens
to be from me] shows exactly the same result: All light type,
including header in the part I wrote, while the quoted material [from
NoOp] is all dark. Here's the post:
[snip]
Above is the part I wrote, all in light type. Below is the quoted part
of the post, which is all dark type:
[snip]
End of quote. And again the type [while all light in my browser] all
shows up dark in composer.
Next I have messages 4, 5, 6 and 7 which all show complete dark type,
including headers.
Message 8 is all dark type except the part past the two dashes, which
is light. I believe this is the way you're saying it should be. And
AFAIK messages 9 and 10 follow in the manner you describe.
Sorry for so much typing, and I hope some of it makes sense.
What you say is clear, but I can't explain the behavior. Sorry.
.
.
Now that I've switched formats for receiving and replying to messages
from this group [and hopefully gotten the excessive new threads problem
cleared up] then all of those messages seem to follow the correct format
for light and dark type. However, I believe I still have the random
switching between light and dark type in all of my other emails; most of
which are from Yahoo groups.
Regards,
James
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
