JD wrote: > Nobody wrote: >> JD wrote: >>> Nobody wrote: >>>> I've just noticed that neither Spybot nor SpywareBlaster >>>> support/recognise SM 2.0, though both worked fully with 1.1.18. >>> >>> I just updated both without a problem. SpywareBlaster had no update but >>> Spybot S&D updated without any probem. What problem did you encounter? >>> >>> Was there a problem when you tried to run Spybot? >>> >> >> Oh, you can update, and both applications "run" but neither is >> recognising SeaMonkey 2.0 so there's no protection: >> >> For me, "Spywareblaster's" status screen shows Internet Destroyer >> (sorry, Int. Explorer -- I do have it installed but seldom use it) and >> Restricted Sites as "Protection Enabled". "Mozilla Firefox" is "not >> detected". With SM 1.1.xx, there was "Protection Enabled" listed for >> SeaMonkey, as well as from memory Moz. FF not detected. >> >> As for Spybot S&D, under "Immunize", I now just see entries for "IE 32 >> bit", "IE 32/64 bit", and "Windows/Global Host". There used to be/should >> be a full listing for SeaMonkey (as with IE's)... as there was for Opera >> when I had it installed. > > On my SpywareBlaster, V 4.2, I can enable and disable the Seamonkey > protection. > > I don't use the Spybot S & D Immunize. When I clicked on it, it gave > me a warning of Open browser, Firefox. And then between IE 64 bit and > Windows, there is a list for Mozilla. Spybot S & D is V 1.6.2.46 > > I don't know why our two programs are different. Sorry. > I also am using Version 4.2 but it does not detect SM2.
-- You either teach people to treat you with dignity and respect, or you don't. This means you are partly responsible for the mistreatment that you get at the hands of someone else. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
