On 12/7/2009 7:05 PM, Mark Hansen wrote: > On 12/7/2009 5:58 PM, Rufus wrote: >> Mark Hansen wrote: >>> On 12/7/2009 12:23 PM, Rufus wrote: >>>> Mark Hansen wrote: >>>>> On 12/7/2009 12:01 PM, Rufus wrote: >>>>>> Philip Chee wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:11:35 -0800, Rufus wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> too...what's up with the interface guys working this project?.. >>>>>>> Unlike Firefox we don't have any UX guys (paid or unpaid) working on >>>>>>> this project. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Phil >>>>>>> >>>>>> ...how about some common sense, then? >>>>>> >>>>> Good Grief! Why anyone would want to purposely insult those who >>>>> volunteer their time for this project and its user base is beyond >>>>> me. >>>>> >>>> I thought they wanted (and deserve...) feedback when they get it wrong? >>>> >>>> The itty-bitty buttons on the new Download panes are pretty clearly >>>> wrong. Particularly for laptop users. It was right before...make it >>>> right again. That seems like common sense, to me. >>>> >>> >>> Your comments were clearly insulting. Not constructive. Whether you agree >>> with a UI (or any other application aspect) choice or not, there is no >>> reason to insult the volunteers working to keep this project moving >>> forward. >>> >>> This is just my humble opinion. I am not one of those volunteers. I am one >>> that appreciates their efforts. >>> >> >> Sorry you feel that way, but they are also accurate...welcome to user >> feedback-land... >> >> Accurate and constructive - far more so than the general "SM 2.0 is >> crap" commentary going on elsewhere by people whom are clearly outraged >> at the "upgrade". The far too small buttons are clearly not a "move >> forward"...and that's just one example. >> >> I may have the team at a disadvantage because I DO evaluate human >> interfaces for software for a living, but my comments still stand - and >> I hope those whom are coding are listening...to ALL of us whom are not >> pleased. I have a growing list of gripes I plan to submit formal bug >> reports against. >> > > My comment wasn't about whether there was a UI problem. I'm sorry you're > not able to keep on track. My comment was with regard to your insult of > the development volunteers. > > Insulting the volunteers is not going to improve the change of getting
Oops, I meant "... not going to improve the chance of getting...". Sorry for the typo. > your favorite issue addressed. You should give some thought to what you > can do to best achieve the goals you desire, rather than just slinging > insults at people. > _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
