On 12/17/2009 3:44 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:13:49 -0500, hawker wrote:
On 12/15/2009 9:15 PM, Martin Freitag wrote:
I'm asking all this because I'm currently questing why I am staying on
Seamonkey. I like a few things about it over Firefox/Thunderbird but
with 2.0 out and many extensions broken or no longer supporting
Seamonkey
Which ones? Most popular extensions which worked in SM1 do work (some
need compatibility enforcement) or have an equivalent in my opinion.
There are a few, the biggest one is that Image Zoom 0.4 dropped SM
support and 0.3x works on 1.1.x but not 2.x.
My Image Zoom 0.3-mod still works in SeaMonkey 2.0 except that the
context menu doesn't work.
<http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html#imagezoom>
Meanwhile I'll look into porting 0.4
=================
Added since 0.3.1
* Added Image Rotate Functions - Firefox Only
* Removed support for Flock, Netscape, Seamonkey, Mozilla
=================
?? curses! Now where did I put the cluebat....
Phil
Thank you. I didn't know that you modified 0.3.1. That makes a big
difference.
As to why I use Image Zoom.
I work on a 1920 x 1200 24" monitor at work, and 1920 x 1200 17" laptop.
Many many web images are just to small when rendered on such a high
resolution screen and I can't see them.
With Image Zoom I RMB and use the scroll wheel over a single image to
make it larger or smaller. Usually I have to make it larger so I can see
it. For E-mail when someone attaches some mega pixel image I can make it
smaller as needed so I can see it. I love that it works in both E-mail
and browser. I use this feature many times a day.
Hawker
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
