On 12/25/2009 04:07 PM, Rufus wrote: ... > > ...your interface should be "dumbed down" to accommodate the "dumbest" > user that you are targeting your product to, or that you expect would > possibly want to try your product. Simpler is better, useful > instructive information provided is always even better.
Nonsense. Please don't advocate this. If you'd like dumbed down look elsewhere. > > What if you grandmother would like to use SM because you recommended it? > Or your 3rd grade aged nephew? Actually, my 89 y.o. grandmother, her 60 y.0. live-in nurse, my 2nd grade nephew, and multiple relatives that haven't the simplest clue about browsers & email clients use SeaMonkey daily. As do nearly one hundred of my commercial client installations. I don't usually say this, but I think it's time that you get a grip regarding SeaMonkey, or move on to something else that suits your requirements. Your continued bitching about SeaMonkey not meeing this, or that, or whatever, has quite frankly become quite irritating. In all honesty, I'm begining to pity the company that you work/consult for. What would you propose SeaMonkey be "dumbed down" to? Would you propose that about:config, prefs.js, and other user modifiable sections simply not become available? _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
