On 02/08/2010 06:25 PM, Kent Briggs wrote: > NoOp wrote: > >> Definitely poorly coded in SeaMonkey/Firefox? > > Uh, yeah. 270 seconds of lockup vs 7 seconds. Even that piece of crap IE > doesn't do that. > >> <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whatwg.org%2Fspecs%2Fweb-apps%2Fcurrent-work%2Fcomplete.html&charset=(detect+automatically)&doctype=Inline&group=0> > > Two minor errors in a large document is causing a 270 second load time? > I don't think so. >
I was thinking that those two issues, being html5 realated (p element) could be an issue by a client that is checking the code. Perhap IE is ignoring it... However, this might be of interest: http://blog.mozilla.com/standards/category/html5/ <quote> so Mozilla, along with Opera, started the WHATWG (http://www.whatwg.org/). </quote> Using the validator from that article: <http://validator.nu/?doc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whatwg.org%2Fspecs%2Fweb-apps%2Fcurrent-work%2Fcomplete.html> seems to show OK. So something is definitely wrong; and perhaps you are right. On the browser click Help|Report Broken Website & report it. Perhaps the irony of Mozilla and Opera browsers having issues with the site will lead to a quick resolution? _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
