Phillip Jones wrote: > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> Phillip Jones wrote: >>> HTML Validator extension indicate no errors but 101 warnings. >> >> Is that the program the German guy sells? >> >> <http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bellagio.com%2F> >> Errors found while checking this document as XHTML 1.0 Transitional! >> Result: 116 Errors, 90 warning(s) >> >> <http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fbellagio.com%2Finclude%2Fstyles.css&profile=css21&usermedium=all&warning=1&lang=en> >> CSS errors and warnings as well. > > HTML Validator 0.8.5.8
Ah, so that's the extension. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/249 and not the 'CSE HTML Validator' that isn't a validator (see Usenet history <g>) http://www.htmlvalidator.com/ > Uses either HTML Tidy , or SGML Parser or both. > it was set to HTML Tidy. > set to serial show 1 warning and 108 errors using SGML Parser > > Regardless its not written correctly. So it would seem... ;-) -- -bts -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
