Robert Kaiser wrote:
Phillip Jones schrieb:
Ant wrote:
On 4/4/2010 5:30 AM PT, Jens Hatlak typed:
Never. 2.1 will use Gecko 1.9.3. We're skipping Gecko 1.9.2.
Ah thanks! Any ETA on its public stable release?
We are just now at 2.0.4 and 2.0 came out in OCT. so four versions in 6
months means one about every 6 weeks. If that continues That will mean
another 36 weeks (6 times 6) or about 9 months. Just an educated guess
based on how its been tracking so far.
Sorry, wrong thinking. 2.1 release planning has nothing to do with 2.0.x
release planning, they are different stable branches.
Robert Kaiser
Isn't the expectation that once 2.1 comes out that all using 2.0
should abandon ship go directly to 2.1 and when 2.2 or 2.3 or 3.0
likewise.
why would want to have several different branches that everyone could
use wouldn't that spread your resources thin just to keep bug fixes a
feature changes in several different branches at the same time.
Wouldn't it be more conserving of time and resources to work on a
version until it gets near end of all the bugs removed, and all the
features added. Then when you get to the point you just patching for
security issues move on to working on a new version.
--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. "If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org
mailto:[email protected]
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
