On 05/18/2010 07:22 AM, Ant wrote:
> Not new, but still bad. :(

Actually excellent. The article can be a little confusing, so re-read.
Basically it shows that Mozilla is the best of the bunch in fixing
security issues & Oracle the worst.

> 
> 
> On 5/17/2010 5:46 PM PT, NoOp typed:
> 
>> Interesting article in the San Jose Mercury News today regarding security:
>>
>> http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_15081540
>> [Cyber crooks target web applications
>>
>> By Steve Johnson
>>
>> [email protected]
>> Posted: 05/15/2010 03:00:00 PM PDT
>> Updated: 05/16/2010 07:01:59 AM PDT]
>>
>> Of note:
>>
>> <quote>
>> By the end of 2009, the report said, Oracle left 38 percent of such
>> flaws without patches, Google 25 percent and Apple 22 percent.
>> Hewlett-Packard, Adobe Systems, Cisco Systems and Mozilla failed to
>> provide patches for just 5 percent or less of what it called "their
>> critical and high vulnerabilities."
>> </quote>
>>
>> <http://www.mercurynews.com/portlet/article/html/imageDisplay.jsp?contentItemRelationshipId=3010398>
>> Shows Mozilla at zero... Well done Mozilla! :-)

_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to