Ray_Net wrote: > Ed Mullen wrote: >> http://validator.w3.org/ > > yes .... but http://home.scarlet.be/~pin10521/TESTPAGE.HTM works > correctly with all browsers ....
Well, to be truthful, there is so little there that could go wrong. However, there are still errors in that page. Errors found while checking this document as HTML 4.01 Transitional! Result: 2 Errors, 2 warning(s) > Just an idea ... How many web pages in percent are W3C compliants > without any error or warning in the world ? :-) A doctoral student did his thesis on this very question a few years ago, and reported on it in some of the web authoring groups. He wrote automated software that accessed and tested millions of web pages. The result at that time was that less than 7% were valid. I doubt if it is any better now, and might even be worse based on new stuff I see every day. There are soooo many 'professional' web developers who apparently have never heard of error-free coding. "It looks ok in IE7!" -- -bts -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
