On 10-09-17 1:35 AM, Ubiquity wrote:
Oh Phillip, don't you just love it! No Phillip, you're not dumb, you're
not stupid, or you're not an idiot. You know what you're talking about,
but the so-called experts sure don't.
To everyone else: Compose a new message, in html. Now, click on Insert,
HTML, and put the following script in the box:
<iframe marginheight="0" marginwidth="0"
src="http://newmail.monsterserve.com/keepout/movies/zip.wav";
type="audio/x-mpeg" frameborder="0" height="16" width="144"></iframe>
then click on the insert button, save the message, then go into your
drafts folder, click on the message, then click on View, Message Source,
and tell me what happened to the html that you just put in.
Phillip, I think everyone owes you an apology, especially those
so-called experts.
Oh, by the way, in order to see what Phillip is talking about, make sure
you're using the newest seamonkey or thunderbird for this testing.
Thanks Ubiquity. Other than a bug number, that's the info we've been
asking for (what sanitizer). The pref Phillip cited is for the
View-->Message_Body_As-->Simple_HTML setting. The change in SeaMonkey
2.0.7 is likely the result a security fix to Gecko, but without bug
numbers, I can't be sure.
http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/seamonkey20.html#seamonkey2.0.7
It would be best to ask in mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey about whether or
not the change affected SeaMonkey mail composition intentionally or not.
Finally, no-one called Phillip dumb, or stupid, or an idiot, just like
no-one called him a crackpot. What I said is that he has a tendency to
spread misinformation.
--
Chris Ilias <http://ilias.ca>
List-owner: support-firefox, support-thunderbird, test-multimedia
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
