W3BNR wrote:
On 9/23/2010 12:31 PM Phillip Jones wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Terry R. wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty pounded out on the keyboard
It's very obvious Phillip knows not of what he speaks, and he should
stop spreading FUD. I know that, without DreamWeaver, Phillip would
not even be able to *have* a web site online.
Geez. Do you feel good about yourself now "BS Nasty"?
As long as Phillip spreads FUD, yes I do.
At least he put forth an effort and created something for his family,
regardless of what he used to do it. That's more than millions of
other people have done.
The site he was discussing was not his regularly posted 'family' site,
but was for some sort of "association" - with members' data at risk to
public exposure. Would you think it is a good idea to let him go on and
expose their information to the public, when that was not what was
requested of him?
Now go and blast every site designer that used FP to code sites
instead,
FrontPage? Doesn't matter what the tool is, if the site is not doing
what it is supposed to be doing.
and leave Phillip be.
What are your thoughts on allowing him to spread false information?
If it doesn't do what I need then I will figure out how to add
User-name/Password. But how does the User, the one that adds the private
content get into a password protected to change the content when needed.
An old Java based program (from 1997) that I used when I needed secure
pages was RiadaLock. I see it's still available at:
http://www.freedownloadscenter.com/Web_Authoring/Java_Programming_Tools/RiadaLock.html
Whether it still works or not, I don't know. I haven't needed it's
capabilities in the last 5 years. But it was still working then.
Dully noted and I copied the link to look at it.
--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. "If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.net/ mailto:[email protected]
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
