[email protected] wrote: >>Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> The normal practice to avoid "undisclosed-recipients" is to place >> your own email address in the TO: field. Since you are sending to >> multiple BCC: people, are you suggesting that you want each >> *recipient's* name in the TO: field that /they/ see? >> >> You can't do that while using multiples in BCC:, except if you want >> to divulge one of them to all the rest. Or send separate emails one >> at a time. > > My recent experience is that this method triggers SPAM filters at the > ISP-level.
Which method? Yourself in the TO:? Or "undisclosed-recipients"? > As soon as I stopped doing this the bounced mails stopped. I regularly send "coming events"-type email to a club I belong to, as the webmaster. I'll put the club address in both the FROM: and the TO:, and all the members in the BCC:. It works, and I do not see rejections or filtering from the ISPs you mention, or any others. > The problems were with comcast, yahoo, frontiernet, and att. My BCC: totals are generally in the 120-130 addresses range. > There are some very serious problems with the interference to > Internet communications by arbitrary/unaccountable ISP-level > filters that need to be addressed. But that is another discussion > for another list. Agreed. :-) -- -bts -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
