David E. Ross wrote: > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> David E. Ross wrote: >>> This is bug #533490. >>> >>> See <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=533490>. >> >> I am curious... what is the worth of creating a Mozilla bug report >> for a matter that is obviously the fault of the web site author's >> incompetence? Is there any kind of advantage to having a bug report >> that will never be acted upon, just filling up the database? > > Tech Evangelism bugs are supposed to be addressed by the Mozilla > organization or its volunteers contacting the owner of the defective > Web site. The bug reports provide a reference for use in such > contacts. They also inform users that the problem lies in the Web > site and not within their browsers. Finally, the bug reports should > also inform users that this is a known problem that needs no further > discussion
Ok, I guess that makes sense. Would there be any record posted with the 'bug' if someone from Moz had contacted the coupon.com site? Otherwise, there's no reason for having the record. People like "doc" here might see it and think it was or it's going to be addressed. It has been over a year. -- -bts -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
