On 1/10/2011 4:40 PM, Walter wrote: > > Ray_Net wrote: >> Robert Kaiser wrote: >>> Rufus schrieb: >>>> I can only assume that all of the same information that was contained in >>>> the flat file and all of the functionality currently in Manage Bookmarks >>>> will be retained...and this is just a change in file structure/format >>>> and not top level functionality... >>> >>> For most things, that's right. The only feature I know that we lost in >>> the transition are groupmarks, which have been replaced by the >>> possibility to open any folder of bookmarks in tabs. Everything else >>> should (as far as I know) be preserved, but 2.1 also adds the >>> possibility to use tags on bookmarks, use "livemarks", saved bookmarks >>> searches, and a few other things (which are easier to do with the >>> database model). >>> >> >> Hi ! >> Could you tell me what a groupmark is ? >> I see only "bookmark", "folder" and "separator" when managing bookmarks. >> > > > I remember word marks and group marks on the old IBM 1401 and 1410. A > gumwum (groupmark+wordmark) would stop any data file record transfer. > Back in the 1960s. > w.
Do you believe that is what is being referred to here? _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
