On 6/10/11 8:04 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: > On 6/10/2011 8:57 PM, David E. Ross wrote: >> Has the Update problem noted in bug #662677 been fixed? If not, will it >> be fixed soon? > > The documentation, I am unsure if it is fixed. But you should not need > to worry about that. > > If you mean the "Extensions installed on updates..." no it has not been > fixed, will not be for 2.1. > > We *may* fix it, but I think the solution will be more of a "mark > extension [x] disabled if you don't want it" rather than "don't stuff > into application folder", since we now push the extensions to the > profile anyway. > > Which means that if you install 2.1 from scratch, including these > extensions, run once, and then uninstall, and re-install without the > extensions, you'll then STILL have those extensions in your profile, > since they install to profile on first launch. >
No. I meant the ability to update from a LOCAL .mar file. See the bug report at <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662677> and read the comments, especiall starting at #13. While the bug report itself is closed because the Wiki documentation has been updated, the procedures did not work to update SM 2.1RC1 to SM2.1RC2 using the partial .mar file. I had expected a new SeaMonkey bug report on this, but none has appeared yet. -- David E. Ross <http://www.rossde.com/> On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of spam from that source. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
