On 6/23/11, Justin Wood (Callek) <[email protected]> wrote:
> I just wanted to make you all aware of a user-facing change I am being
> forced to make for SeaMonkey 2.2
>
> The idea is I'd either not make it, or risk keeping users exposed to
> security risks far longer than should be the case.
>
> Bug 666518 (PLEASE respond only here unless you are helping to FIX the
> bug, advocacy will be fine in newsgroups/e-mail but not bug, thank you)
>
> I will be removing the Windows Installers' ability to selectively
> install extensions.
>
> The codepaths that make the packaging of the installer able to support
> this feature are very complex, and apparantly quite easy to break. While
> removing the ability entirely (user facing anyway) is as simple as
> dropping one variable in a makefile we control.
>
> I do have ideas on how I can restore the basic functionality offered by
> this installer feature, but it won't be until 2.5 at the earliest I can
> get that working, and I have no guarantees as I have not looked deeply
> into it yet. But I feel that my efforts to support a very complex system
> here which HAVE to coexist with the Firefox systems and are only growing
> in complexity as of late, are better spent supporting other aspects of
> SeaMonkey and doing bug fixing/stability/releng on a wider scale.
>
> After reading that bug, if you have any
> comments/complaints/show-of-support or suggestions, please feel free to
> state them here.

show-of-support: thank you for continuing to work on SeaMonkey

After looking at the bug report I'm no closer to understanding what
the security risks are, but if all it means is I have to do another
step or three to uninstall extensions that I don't want vs. some
security issue.. I think you made the right decision.

Thanks again,
Lee
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to