Rick Merrill wrote:
Ok, stupid question du jour: why doesn't the SeaMonkey 2.1 installer have "a valid digital signature"?
Sadly we do not yet possess the ability to digitally sign our installer. It needs a few things to accomplish.
1) a machine much more secure than our current machines, and dedicated to just signing. 2) a digital certificate to use for signing, from a valid certificate authority.
We have neither of those at this time, we do hope to be in a position to get those. But until then all our release builds are unsigned.
-- ~Justin Wood (Callek) _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
