Paul Bergsagel wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Is it just me, or does 2.6 seems significantly "snappier" than 2.5? I
know about the improvements in Javascript, but it feels way more than a
30% improvement in Javascript. For instance, I'm used to messages taking
a second or so after I click "send" to actually be sent (showing
horizontal barberpole progress bar in the meantime) and close the
window, but so far they seem to be going with no delay at all.
Yes SeaMonkey does seem snappier and more responsive. I'm not sure if
the zippiness is due to the JavaScript improvements or the fresh
installation of SeaMonkey. I guess I will know which it is when
SeaMonkey is a few days old and now longer a fresh installation.
Anyways Kudos to the developers of v 2.6. Seems very good for the time I
have used it,
BTW my Mac OS 10.6.8.
Seconding the snappiness observation. On my Lion Mac Pro I haven't
noticed much of a difference, but on my ancient 2006 MacBook Pro with
Snow Leopard it's noticeably faster. Kudos to the developers indeed :)
--
Cheers,
Ruben Schade
@Rubenerd on Twitter
http://RubenSchade.com/ http://Rubenerd.com/
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
