Interviewed by CNN on 23/01/2012 10:09, Michael Lueck told the world: > WLS wrote: >> Hmm, I have no idea what considerable damage you are referring to >> concerning the Thunderbird product. > > My main gripe with TB > 2.0.x series... > > [Bug 81141] [RFE] Ability to rebuild msf files on demand > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81141 > > TB code is now unsafe to trust valuable email / nntp content to.
I didn't read the entire bug thread, but the complaints seemed to be regarding a lack of a specific tool to check/rebuild all the .msf index files. Seamonkey uses basically the same engine, and also lacks this tool. I didn't see anything in that thread suggesting that TB 3.x is significantly worse than 2.x -- but again, AFAIK SM uses the same engine as recent (9.x?) TB builds. The main differences between TB and SM Mail seem to be the new user interface in TB. I'm sorry, but I didn't find anything there suggesting that TB had become significantly less reliable than SM Mail, or that .msf corruption risks were significantly lower in SM. I just don't get it. -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... Sent from my Xerox copier. * Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.6 * Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
