On 01/23/2012 09:32 PM, Sailfish wrote: > My bloviated meandering follows what David E. Ross graced us with on > 1/23/2012 5:04 PM: >> On 1/22/12 12:14 PM, David E. Ross wrote: >>> When I try to install BetterPrivacy 1.68 in SeaMonkey 2.6.1, I get the >>> following error: "BetterPrivacy could not be installed because it is >>> not compatible with SeaMonkey 2.6.1." I get this even when I attempt to >>> install directly from the AMO site (not my usual practice). >>> >>> By the way, selecting the link >>> <https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/betterprivacy/> >>> redirects to >>> <https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/betterprivacy/>. >>> >> >> Examining the install.rdf file for 1.68, I believe SeaMonkey >> compatibility was intentionally blocked. >> >> For SeaMonkey, the install.rdf file has >> <!--SeaMonkey--> >> <Description RDF:about="rdf:#$dLacB4" >> em:id="{92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a}" >> em:minVersion="2.0a1" >> em:maxVersion="2.6.*" >> /> >> Notice the "RDF:about", not the "em:maxVersion". >> >> At the end of the install.rdf file, the line >> that points to SeaMonkey has been commented out as >> <!--em:targetApplication RDF:resource="rdf:#$dLacB4"/--> >> Notice the "RDF:resource", which should be pointing to the "RDF:about". >> However, strings bracketed between <!-- and --> are comments. >> > Good sleuthing on your part. I uncommented the targetApplication entry > and replaced the install.rdf file and it installed fine. Also, I noticed > that it's not listed when I searched the Seamonkey Addons Privacy > section, > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/extensions/privacy-and-security/?sort=users > >
Doesn't SeaMonkey clear Flash Cookies, like Firefox, so Better Privacy is no longer needed? -- Thunderbird Beta _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
