Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
But if I were reading this through webmail, and I had SM programmed to
reject images that didn't come from the originating server, then only if
my ISP were cnet.com would it load this, right? Which is the question I
asked several posts back.
Well, it was in an email from cnet.com, and they are not an ISP. I guess
you would see the images at your webmail page. My wife uses hotmail, has
the SeaMonkey setting to not load external images, but still sees them in
any HTML email she opens at hotmail. So I suppose the answer is "you
would see them." (Unless they were 0x0 or 1x1 pixel images which would be
invisible)
The difference, I assume, is that the setting is for the email client and
not the browser. Two different animals.
Not the same setting, as I showed upthread. Here's the browser setting I
was asking about:
Edit | Preferences | Privacy & Security:
Image Acceptance Policy
Specify how SeaMonkey handles images
(o) Do not load any images
(•) Only load images that come from the originating server
(o) Load all images
I'd be interested in hearing what an expert has to say about how
effective this would be. Does "the originating server" mean the
website you're visiting? If I visit devils.nhl.com, will I get
images from nhl.com?
See?
--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
Would you mind removing the second "-- " sig delimiter in your sig,
please? Some newsreaders, like my Pan, see the second and ignore the
first, so don't trim the first part. Thanks.
Never heard that before. I'll think about how I want to reconfigure the
sig, but of course having that bit survive seems a positive thing to
me... ;-)
--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
