Libertarian Lilly wrote:
gjikkl<[email protected]> wrote :
Jean Zebloski wrote:
Why would Seamonkey be chewing up 430 megs of RAM all the time?
Because it makes ineficient use of cache, but works toward that has been
initiated and they say will continue to improve over time, for now he
have to settle for a FAT SEAMONKEY, that's getting thiner VERY SLOWLY.
People keep saying to just give it up and use Firefox.
With the interminably slow bookmarks loading in SM, I'm getting to agree with
them.
*YOU* (and others) may experience "interminably slow bookmarks loading
in SM", but I (and others) do not, so the problem may be with your
bookmarks file!
--
Daniel
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
