"Tom Pamin" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > Sridhar Ayengar wrote: >> It seems to use noticeably less CPU and memory than 2.9, but for some >> reason, 2.10 goes apeshit every few minutes and pegs one CPU core for a >> few seconds, going nonresponsive. After a few seconds, it is fine again. >> However, it repeats every few minutes. >> >> Usually, it seems that the freeze is precipitated when I try to scroll >> content in one of the browser tabs. I have a large number of tabs open >> and the process is using 1.3GB RAM. This is on Windows 7 Pro x64 on a >> machine with 8GB RAM and a 2.5GHz Core 2 Duo. I do have a few Addons >> running, and I will list them if necessary. >> >> This is quite annoying as it makes it pretty difficult to watch YouTube >> movies and the like. Thanks. >> >> Peace... Sridhar > > 2.10 is locking up terribly on my XP PC. Never really saw anything like it > on a release version. IE works fine, so I went back to 2.91 for SM, and > all is well. Was 2.10 tested sufficiently? >
I've read all this bad stuff about 2.10 and I still have 2.7 on my host XP Pro machine so I was afraid to install it. I decided to install it a few hours ago on a virtual machine on XP Pro instead of the host machine. It works great so far. I just watched over an hour of tiger movies at youtube with no problems. I installed the extensions I have on 2.7 and they work fine. I did not have SM on this guest machine at all so this was a clean install of 2.10 not an upgrade on top of an earlier version. That might have something to do with it working so well. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
