Daniel wrote: > [email protected] wrote: >> Daniel wrote: >>> Jesse Molina wrote: >>>> >>>> I am seeing much increased instability in seamonkey 2.11 on Linux, >>>> amd64 >>>> version. >>>> >>>> Can anyone else using SM linux confirm or deny? >>>> >>>> I did a memtest86+ overnight just a few days ago to check and >>>> everything >>>> came up clean. >>>> >>> >>> Not a problem for me on Mandriva Linux 2009.0!! >>> >>> Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:14.0) >>> Gecko/20120715 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11 >>> >> >> 2.10 was utterly unstable for 64 bit linux peppermint three... 2.11 is >> rock solid thus far... >> >> sean > > Might be something in the peppermint then, sean.! Haven't had a crash on > my Mandriva in yonks!!
Maybe a dozen crashes in the past year. Periodic build failures usually require blowing away the tree and starting from scratch. User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14a1 Build identifier: 20120808112204 Slackware-current. -- Send in the clowns. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
