On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:52:56 -0300, MCBastos wrote: > Interesting post about preference dialogs: > > <http://limi.net/checkboxes-that-kill> > > Food for thought. That was about Firefox, but Seamonkey has probably > even more options exposed through the main preferences interface. Are > there some of them that should be hidden because they do more harm than > good? > > I used to work under the assumption that Seamonkey is mostly used by > power-users who use it exactly for those exposed features, but recently > posted statistics show a large drop of SM usage on weekends -- > suggesting those users use SM only at work, and something else at home. > That is, they don't use SM by choice, but because it's company policy. > Those groups of users would benefit from a streamlined, idiot-proofed > preferences system.
See: Bug 288764 - Add ability to hide some of the more advanced prefs https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=288764 Phil -- Philip Chee <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
