Geoff Welsh wrote: > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> Geoff Welsh wrote: >>> and since the page was obviously designed to only work on IE, >> >> I think that is an assumption. The real problem is one of "author does >> not know how to design for other than his own default fonts." > > I wasn't so much assuming as quickly concluding from this crap: > > <!--[if IE 8]> > <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" > href="/static/css/screen-ie8.css" /> > <![endif]--> <!--[if IE 7]> > <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" > href="/static/css/screen-ie7.css" /> > <![endif]--> <!--[if IE 6]> > <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" > href="/static/css/screen-ie6.css" /> > <![endif]--> > > as previously noted in another response.
That crap, as you describe, call small specialist style sheets for three versions of IE. Note in the source, however, all the rest of the style sheets used by all browsers (including IE). The specialist ones are overrides only seen by IE. > If a site AUTHOR were to ask what he's doing wrong, OTOH, that would be > great and I think we would all be glad to help. Sure. But would he and his staff understand? Probably not likely. There is more than 115 kilobytes of CSS on that one page, and it reads as if multiple people have written it, based on style of writing. Most of the main fonts and divisions of the page are assigned in pixel sizes. That's the problem. -- -bts -This space for rent, but the price is high _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
