Re: Archiving SeaMonkey (Message No. 7) Don't save your archives on your hard drive! During a recent repair, HP reformatted my C:\ drive, and wiped out everything of mine when they set it back to factory default. Use a C D- DVD!
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 10:20 AM To: [email protected] Subject: support-seamonkey Digest, Vol 88, Issue 31 Send support-seamonkey mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of support-seamonkey digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Who's thread is this, anyway?? (was:- Re: Context menu horrible large and it doesn't work in 2.17) (Daniel) 2. Re: SM 2.17 breaks Mailredirect extension (Daniel) 3. Re: SM 2.17 breaks Mailredirect extension (Daniel) 4. Re: Who's thread is this, anyway?? (WaltS) 5. Re: Context menu horrible large and it doesn't work in 2.17 (WaltS) 6. OT Re: IETab? (Daniel) 7. Re: Archive Email Messages? (Daniel) 8. Re: Newsgroups, reply types (SM 2.17) (Daniel) 9. Opps ....Sorry Otto (Re: Who's thread is this, anyway??) (Daniel) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:24:45 +1000 From: Daniel <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Who's thread is this, anyway?? (was:- Re: Context menu horrible large and it doesn't work in 2.17) Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Otto Wyss wrote: > Ed Mullen wrote: >> Daniel wrote: >>> Erness Wild wrote: >>> > Can we go back to the original problem, the context menu. Please > discuss about::config somewhere else. Otto, I seem to remember one of the bosses here stating that threads are, effectively, under the control of the poster who posted the original post! The OP can take the thread where *they* want. Therefore, I was responding to the thread creators re-response! It having a different focus to the original post is not my problem, it might be your problem (because *you* didn't get an answer to the question *you* had not, yet, asked!!), but not mine! -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:34:42 +1000 From: Daniel <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SM 2.17 breaks Mailredirect extension Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed NFN Smith wrote: > Daniel wrote: > >> All very good, Bob, but some here don't read the Subject's of the post, >> they look at the content of the message, so just putting "FYI" in the >> message may not be very useful! >> >> Perhaps if you were to give a bit more detail as to what you are seeing > > Yep. Just love problem reports that are some version of "it doesn't > work", without describing what that actually means. > >> might help other extension users to know if they are experiencing the >> same, or different, problem and the extension developer might be able >> make a start or fixing things. Do you get any error messages on screen >> or in the Error console (Tools->Web Development->Error Console). > > I'm seeing the same difficulty. > > The key symptom that I'm seeing is that the drop down for selecting the > sending account is blank (actually "...") Thus, if you click "send", > nothing happens, presumably because no account has been/can be selected. > > I checked this against Thunderbird 17.0.5, and the problem isn't there. > It seems to be specific to Seamonkey 2.17. > > > That said, I would not assume that the developer of Mailredirect reads > mozilla.support.seamonkey. Thus, for the OP, a better course of action > would be to file a bug report with the maintainer of that extension. I > may get around to doing that myself, in a few days, but it's not > something that's especially urgent for me to do. > > Smith Thanks for this, Smithy, at least we now have half a clue what Bob might be talking about. -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:31:14 +1000 From: Daniel <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SM 2.17 breaks Mailredirect extension Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Bob Fleischer wrote: > Daniel wrote: >> Bob Fleischer wrote: >>> Daniel wrote: >>>> Bob Fleischer wrote: >>>>> FYI >>>> >>>> Sorry, Bob, did you mean to tell the Mailredirect Extension Developer >>>> that >>>> his/her "Mailredirect" extension does not work with SM 2.17?? Or >>>> something >>>> else?? >>>> >>> >>> The developer, or SeaMonkey users, or possibly the SeaMonkey developers >>> would find this of interest. >>> >>> It can be helpful to somebody who is experiencing an issue to see that >>> somebody else has noticed the same issue. >>> >>> It can also raise a flag to developers that something was changed >>> perhaps in an unexpected area. >>> >>> Bob >> >> All very good, Bob, but some here don't read the Subject's of the post, >> they look at the content of the message, so just putting "FYI" in the >> message may not be very useful! >> >> Perhaps if you were to give a bit more detail as to what you are seeing >> might help other extension users to know if they are experiencing the >> same, or different, problem and the extension developer might be able >> make a start or fixing things. Do you get any error messages on screen >> or in the Error console (Tools->Web Development->Error Console). >> > I don't have any more information on this. The redirect window does pop > up, but it is incorrect in content and does not function. Can I attach > a screen shot? > > Bob Bob, TPTB here used to allow posters to post a screen shot to one of the other ng's here-abouts but diffinatly not here. I think that other NG has since been closed, so you may have to post you screen shot to one of the free image hosting sites ..... sorry, I don't know one, so cannot suggest to you. -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 09:47:57 -0400 From: WaltS <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Who's thread is this, anyway?? Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On 04/09/2013 09:24 AM, Daniel wrote: > Otto Wyss wrote: >> Ed Mullen wrote: >>> Daniel wrote: >>>> Erness Wild wrote: >>>> >> Can we go back to the original problem, the context menu. Please discuss >> about::config somewhere else. > > Otto, I seem to remember one of the bosses here stating that threads > are, effectively, under the control of the poster who posted the > original post! The OP can take the thread where *they* want. > > Therefore, I was responding to the thread creators re-response! It > having a different focus to the original post is not my problem, it > might be your problem (because *you* didn't get an answer to the > question *you* had not, yet, asked!!), but not mine! > I'm confused. Otto originally posted his question in m.general, which you set followup-to: to this newsgroup, so the original thread is his about context menu problems. Seems he got put off by you derailing it with your reply to Erness about about:config settings, the following replies, and the non-support he received here, since he hasn't replied to requests for more information. If Otto is still around this may help. <http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=2686991> -- openSUSE 12.3 (64-bit) KDE 4.10.0 Thunderbird Release April is Jazz Appreciation Month ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 09:49:15 -0400 From: WaltS <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Context menu horrible large and it doesn't work in 2.17 Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On 04/07/2013 04:27 PM, Otto Wyss wrote: > Ed Mullen wrote: >> Daniel wrote: >>> Erness Wild wrote: >>> > Can we go back to the original problem, the context menu. Please discuss > about::config somewhere else. > > > Firebug is an extension that caused context menus to have many extra selections. <http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=2686991> -- openSUSE 12.3 (64-bit) KDE 4.10.0 Thunderbird Release April is Jazz Appreciation Month ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:51:57 +1000 From: Daniel <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: OT Re: IETab? Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Tom Pamin wrote: > Iceman wrote: >> On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 06:22:17 -0400, Tom Pamin wrote in message >> <news:[email protected]>: >> >>> Is there any version of IETab that still works with SM and IE10? >> >> IE Tab V2 works with SM 2+, but IE 9 is the most recent compatibility >> level, according to their support forum. >> >> You can get it at: >> https://addons.mozilla.org/EN-US/seamonkey/addon/ie-tab-2-sm-20/?src=search >> >> > > Thanks - it does work with IE10. How does IETab work with IE10?? Or are you trying to suggests that the results provided by SM 2.17 with IETab installed display a particular page the same as it would appear in IE10?? -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:01:31 +1000 From: Daniel <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Archive Email Messages? Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Gerry Hickman wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to archive all email messages from 2008, 2009, then save them > off-line. I noticed a setting in > > Mail & Newsgroups account settings : <account name> : Copies and Folders > Message Archives > > This sounds like it would solve the first part, but I don't know how to > start the archive process? > > Assuming I can get an "Archives" folder inside "Local Folders", > containing yearly archives, the next part is how can I save that folder > outside of SeaMonkey, and how can I restore it if needed? > > I seem to remember this was easy in Netscape 3.x. They also have it in > Outlook. Gerry, I've never noticed/used the setting you have pointed to, but I don't think it will do what you want!! ... but it might!! When I want to archive my mail, I set up several folders, in SeaMonkey Mail Account, at the same level as the Inbox, e.g. I have folders for 2013_Family, 2013_Jokes, 2013_Moz_SM, etc., and I then drag e-mails (both Sent & received) into the appropriate folders, then at the end of each year, I move these folders to the "Local Folders" Account, but if you wanted you could close SM and move these folders to some other location on your HD, or, burn the folders (or your entire e-mail account) to CD/DVD's or store them elsewhere off-line. HTH -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:09:57 +1000 From: Daniel <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Newsgroups, reply types (SM 2.17) Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Ilya wrote: > Hello, guys. > > I'm bit confused about 2 of 4 newsgroup reply types: > > When I chose to "Reply to Sender and Newsgroup", the message goes to the > newsgroup only. > > When I chose to "Reply to All", the message goes to the sender and to > the newsgroup. > > Why doesn't "Reply to Sender and Newsgroup" work the way it's supposed > to and why does "Reply to All" do what "Replay to Sender and Newsgroup" > should do? Ilya, could I ask, Why do you want to (be able to) reply directly to a Sender?? If the Sender has posted to this/any group, chances are they will be back and see your reply! So why annoy them/me by replying directly to them/me at all? To para-phrase someone ..... what happens on the group remains on the group!! -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:16:12 +1000 From: Daniel <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Opps ....Sorry Otto (Re: Who's thread is this, anyway??) Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed WaltS wrote: > On 04/09/2013 09:24 AM, Daniel wrote: >> Otto Wyss wrote: >>> Ed Mullen wrote: >>>> Daniel wrote: >>>>> Erness Wild wrote: >>>>> >>> Can we go back to the original problem, the context menu. Please discuss >>> about::config somewhere else. >> >> Otto, I seem to remember one of the bosses here stating that threads >> are, effectively, under the control of the poster who posted the >> original post! The OP can take the thread where *they* want. >> >> Therefore, I was responding to the thread creators re-response! It >> having a different focus to the original post is not my problem, it >> might be your problem (because *you* didn't get an answer to the >> question *you* had not, yet, asked!!), but not mine! >> > > I'm confused. > > Otto originally posted his question in m.general, which you set > followup-to: to this newsgroup, so the original thread is his about > context menu problems. Looks like I'm confusing myself as well as others!! Sorry. > Seems he got put off by you derailing it with your reply to Erness about > about:config settings, the following replies, and the non-support he > received here, since he hasn't replied to requests for more information. > > If Otto is still around this may help. > > <http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=2686991> > -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715 ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey End of support-seamonkey Digest, Vol 88, Issue 31 ************************************************* _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
