MCBastos wrote, On 6/13/2013 11:14 PM:
Interviewed by CNN on 13/06/2013 09:55, Doug Parsons told the world:
I have a site I go to that essentially has document linking to document
linking to document, kind of a 'digest' 'newsy' thing. Firefox has
started taking forever to load the next page and sometimes freezes.
SeaMonkey is lickety-split. Yippee !!
That's odd, because the rendering engine in both is the same. There
shouldn't be any significant difference in performance. Unless...
....unless there is some sort of extension interfering in the process?
You might wish to try reseting Firefox to its default settings, to see
if the problem goes away:
<https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/reset-firefox-easily-fix-most-problems>
To be honest, this is one of the major reasons *I* use SeaMonkey.
Sites such as thehuffingtonpost and thechive constantly refresh and
update and all that jazz... they seem to be more 'tame' in SM versus any
other browser I've tried.
'Tame' is a relative term- the pages still occasionally misbehave and
hang, but for the most part SM without Flash works *MUCH* better than
Firefox on these sites for me.
Could be 32bit SM versus 64bit Firefox, but the difference is so
pronounced I doubt it.
Benjamin
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
