Perhaps you misunderstood what I am asking. I have not seen a Nightly Build for SeaMonkey/2.24a1 since September 19 for Linux systems. Moreover, the Aurora Build process for 2.23 also ceased, though later, on October 28.
Windows builds still seem to be regular; Mac platforms have also been inconsistent, though not quite to the extent of the latest lapse in Linux builds. I even looked at Tinderbox builds; there appears to be a few of them, but something apparently failed after the 19th of September for the nightly builds; the remaining 2.24a1 builds were not created for Linux systems, and no Linux builds are available at all for 2.25a1, and that is the issue I am asking about. On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Philip Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't pretend to understand the Seamonkey release programme > at all, but browsing : > > http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/ > > seems to shew a lot of things more recent than September 19th. > Are, perhaps, any of the things shewn the thing(s) for which > you are seeking ? > > Philip Taylor > -------- > [email protected] wrote: > > I am currently using the following Seamonkey Nightly Build: > > > > You are currently on the nightly update channel. > > See a list of contributors to the Mozilla Project. > > Read the licensing information for this product. > > Read the release notes for this version. > > See the build configuration used for this version. > > User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 > Firefox/27.0 SeaMonkey/2.24a1 > > Build identifier: 20130919003001 > > > > This build works very well, but it has also been static since September > 19. I also notice that Aurora builds for all platforms ceased updates > after October 28. Are there build issues, lack of resources, or what? I > am not a Seamonkey developer but I've been testing Mozilla builds of > Seamonkey and Firefox for quite some time now. The Firefox Nightly Builds > continue to be available for my hardware, just not the Seamonkey builds. > > > > Any particular reason for this? While I use both browsers, I do still > tend to favor Seamonkey; for my specific interests and needs it works > particularly well, so I'm concerned about its current and future support. > I'd appreciate an update, thanks! > > > > -- > Windows 8 ? Just say "no". > -- Brian Masinick _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
