Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> Ray Davison wrote: >> So at this point just blame the site, right? W3.org says "336 warnings >> and 392 errors. I did not try to get any detail. The page is very >> "busy", and I have not checked a page in so long I don't know what is >> typical. > I'm surprised W3.org fact-checked the site, but I'm not surprised how > many warnings and errors they found. ;-) I think you misunderstand Ray Davison. He is not saying "W3.org fact-checked the site"; he is saying "I checked the site, using the W3.org validation service". Philip Taylor _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
