On 1/30/2014 4:41 PM, Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote:
On 1/30/2014 1:13 AM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On 30/01/2014 02:23, Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote:
Since it looks like 2.24b1 failed to build, will we see a 2.24b2 or
just straight to 2.24?
1. Our release engineering team says 2.24 uplift is on 3rd February.
2. There may or may not be a b1 but the timing is very tight.
3. "I'm very doubtful there'll be a b2"
Phil
And what does this lack/skipping of a stage, or two, of user testing
portend for the quality of the expected product release?
--Rostyk
To me the user it means I lack confidence and I'll stay on 2.21 for now.
I was told that all the bugs that concern me would be fixed by 2.24 so I
was going to do it, now I'm concerned and think I better skip to 2.25.
To many issues the last few releases to risk it.
2.23 has been really good for me. Snappy and fast. You should at least
be on that version if you're not already.
- Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP]
There are a few serious bugs regarding e-mail that prevent me from using
that. Until the IMAP stuff is fixed I can't update.
I had to do this somewhere around 2.16 too when there was a string of
issues that was not fixed for a few versions. Jumping a few versions at
a time has been less painful then getting the bugs along the way.
Honestly I'm very close to switching to FF/TB the number of bugs, lack
of enough SM team folks and lack of features and support for SM is
making me rethink this decision. I already switched to TB for personal
e-mail and thinking for work it may be time. I could use the fast
search in TB that SM seems they will never bring over for one. I just
don't like the TB UI.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
