hawker wrote: > On 3/11/2014 12:36 PM, WaltS wrote: >> On 03/11/2014 11:43 AM, Ray_Net wrote: >>> cyberzen wrote, On 11/03/2014 09:01: >>>> Le 10/03/2014 02:14, Paul B. Gallagher a écrit : >>>>> Arnie Goetchius wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I have been struggling with this issue for nearly a month. >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. It is only a problem on my XP SP3 machines which also have less >>>>>> memory and slower cpu. I have no problem on newer, faster machines >>>>>> running Win 7. >>>>> >>>>> <http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2014/03/08/millions-of-computer-may-be-at-risk-of-attack-next-month/> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Think about it. >>>>> >>>> think about Linux >>>> >>> If you like to be a geek :-) >> >> >> No need to be a geek despite my geeky instructions to lxuser in >> m.s.firefox. >> >> I can give you the GUI instructions if interested. > > More like need to not be using any real world applications and be less > productive with the simpler Linux equivalent of the others. > > 90% of the applications I need to use every day for work have no Linux > equivalent. For home use I could pretty much move to Linux but not even > close for work. I would still have to run some sort of PC OS. > Linux just does not have industry recognized business applications, > electrical engineering applications, CAD apps, PCB layout apps or > targeted embedded processor apps. All of which I use daily. Same issue > with Mac. >
If your statements are in fact true, you are in a very small minority of the work force. I wish people would stop spreading FUD about linux. I would wager that 90% of the workforce could be transitioned to linux with no major problems. Dennis _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
