On 05/24/2014 03:22 PM, Lee wrote: > comments in-line > > On 5/24/14, NoOp <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 05/24/2014 04:47 AM, Lee wrote: >>> Well I think I found something! >>> >>> Could not verify this Certificate because the issuer is unknown >>> >>> Issued to >>> Common Name (CN Name of bank >>> Organization (O) DO-NOT-TRUST >>> Organizational unit (OU) Created by http://www.fiddler2.com >>> Serial Number >>> D5:45:43:f3:bbe2:56:A7:40:D2:83:OF:2A:99:4D:19 >>> >>> Issued By >>> >>> Common Name (CN) DO_NOT_TRUST_FiddlerRoot >>> Organization (0) DO_NOT_TRUST >>> Organizational Unit (OU) Created by http://www.fiddler2.com >>> >>> Validity >>> Issued On 5/13/2014 >>> Expires on 5/12/2024 >>> >>> Fingerprints >>> SHA1 >>> 16:E2:6D"E2:99:FD:CO:B8:54:3F:39:7d:80:C1:2D:26:F1:AA:25:57 >>> MDS Fingerprint A9:41:5e:3a:b4:8E:D8:D6:95:8D:609:5c:82:55:11:07 >>> >> >> Well... there is nothing nefarious about fiddler2.com itself. Fiddler is >> a free web debugging proxy for any browser, system or platform. >> Basically it's a developer's debugger tool. Just so 'Fiddler' >> fiddler2.com doesn't get a bad rap in the archives: >> >> <http://www.telerik.com/fiddler> >> <http://www.telerik.com/fiddler#KeyFeatures> >> <http://blogs.telerik.com/fiddler/posts/13-08-19/faq---certificates-in-fiddler> > > Did I say anything bad about fiddler? I didn't think I did, but ...
Are you [email protected] ? I think you are [email protected]. Did you write msg: [email protected]? Newsgroups: mozilla.support.seamonkey Subject: Re: Ref my computer problem accessing web sites fault This connection is Untrusted References: <[email protected]> In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> So unless you wrote that 'In-Reply-To' message then I reckon that you are confused :-) <snip rest of reasonable advice/info> _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
