WaltS48 wrote, On 03/08/2014 16:25:
On 08/03/2014 09:47 AM, Trane Francks wrote:
On 8/3/14 6:49 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 03/08/14 19:25, Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 03/08/2014 11:14:
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/08/14 00:48, Philip Taylor wrote:
2.17.1 : also blank. A peek behind the scenes reveals ---
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";><html><head>(head content
omitted)</head><body itemscope
itemtype="http://schema.org/CollectionPage";></body></html>
Since <body> is empty, nothing can be rendered unless it is
populated by
scripting or content added by CSS.
Philip Taylor
Good catch, Philip, but couldn't
http://schema.org/CollectionPage be
the
content that is supposed to be displayed, at least??
No. Try it yourself.
Try what, David?? Up-thread I typed that clicking on the original
link, I got a blank screen, but, clicking on the schema.org link
with-in the code worked.
But did not give you what https://www.google.com/fonts is.
So http://schema.org/CollectionPage is NOT what is supposed to be
displayed.
If the schema page is not supposed to be displayed, why is
</script></head><body itemscope
itemtype="http://schema.org/CollectionPage";></body></html>
it in the coding at all??
In addition to the answers already offered, the content of both pages is
ENTIRELY different. To suggest that seeing one is equivalent to seeing
the other is simply wrong.
So has anybody filed a bug report?
For what reason .... opening a report who will stay open 15 years ?
Certainly if someone have explained that the bug is on the server site
and not in SM.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
