Patrick Turner wrote:
Then I posted up the completed re-done page and it seems to work OK
when I browse it from my website via the Internet, ie, online.
http://www.turneraudio.com.au/80W-AB1-amp-2014.html
And this :
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-j6lISKa1Grw/U_r9rGVy-kI/AAAAAAAAJGQ/IRblj2UxFJA/s640/Fullscreen%2520capture%252025082014%2520100730.jpg
is what it looks like here.
PLEASE, Patrick, invest a tiny tiny part of your life in understand
the web philosophy ("the viewer decides line length, font size, etc.,
not the author") and stop trying to inflict /your/ ideas of optimal
line length on others. Remove all those horrible <br>s that represent
/your/ idea of an optimal line turn, learn about "p {max-width: 42em}",
and move out of the 19th century into the 21st. Then, and only then,
will you stand the slightest chance of your visitors seeing the page
at its best, rather than as the monstrosity that it is today. And then
you might like to pay some attention to the prose, because in places
it appears to demonstrate all the literacy skills of a 10-year-old
with learning difficulties.
Very sincerely :
Philip Taylor
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
