Desiree wrote:
On 9/10/2014 1:53 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
On 10/09/2014 08:33, Rufus wrote:
I know that the folks at Ghostery had announced that they wouldn't be
supporting some future SM release, but it had been working on my Macs
past that announcement with SM 2.26.1...now with 2.29 it doesn't. Won't
even launch Options.
<http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r29307983-Seamonkey-New-Ghostery-version-5.3.1-no-longer-supports-SeaMonkey#29310345>
Bug 1060858 - Ghostery 5.3.1 does not support SeaMonkey
<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1060858>
Phil
I'm a longtime SeaMonkey user (going back to Mozilla Suite around the
end of the last century-never was an IE person) currently on Windows 8.0
Pro. But I won't use it now. Ghostery is more important to me than
SeaMonkey....sad it has to be this way.
I read the bug. Pathetic that no one seems to want to resolve the
issue. I do thank you for your comments in the bug. I raised this
question with Ghostery back when Ghostery first stopped working with
SeaMonkey. I groaned when it was explained to me by Ghostery employees
why this had happened. I'm by no means the only long time SeaMonkey
user who is walking away from a browser I have always really liked all
these many years. I have already left Fx at 24.8.0 ESR (for the
superior Pale Moon fork). The attitude of Addons management regarding
this extremely important issue of non-working Ghostery in the current
and previous version of SM is reflective of everything that has
gradually become wrong with Fx and now is affecting SeaMonkey also.
What happened to SeaMonkey and Thunderbird having their own Addons site?
That went nowhere beyond preliminary discussion?
I've gone back to SM 2.26.1...this isn't the first time (or the only
software) where I've reverted to a previous version because that
previous version does what I *want* it to do and the "upgrade" doesn't.
--
- Rufus
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
