On 04/11/14 11:31, WaltS48 wrote:
On 11/03/2014 06:05 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
EE wrote, On 03/11/2014 19:19:
Poldek wrote:
[email protected] wrote:
I echo this sentiment. As a developer and web user since
the NCSA Mosaic days, I am glad to see Seamonkey remain true
to its roots as a no-nonsense product not afraid to expose
the "dirty guts" instead of dumbing it down like some other
browsers.
I have only recently switched back to Seamonkey after the long
and arduous experience with firefox, chromium, and opera.
Having just installed and taken Seamonkey for a spin on my Mac
I am amazed at how responsive and fast it is compared to the
other browsers.
Keep up the good work. Thanks for all the fish.
I keep using SeaMonkey since Netscape Navigator 3.xx and Windows
3.11 :-)
It's the BEST!
I agree. It is the best of the Mozilla applications, and the best
browser available.
I am happy with it. However SM would be PERFECT if all the bugs are
corrected :-)
Might help if somebody helped triage these 108 Unconfirmed Bugs
<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?list_id=11498558&resolution=---&classification=Client%20Software&query_format=advanced&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&component=General&product=SeaMonkey>
Walt, this topic of triaging SM bugs came up at yesterdays SM devs
meeting on IRC (was it before or after I noticed you logging on to IRC??).
--
Daniel
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.29 Build identifier: 20140829003846
or
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.30 Build identifier: 20141009214701
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
