WaltS48 wrote:
On 01/09/2015 08:44 PM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
I am growing more and more tempted to abandon seamonkey due to the
continuing and expanding list of issues. First is the password issue
that forces me to keep a tab open to the data manager in order to be
able to copy/paste passwords that are no longer being filled in after
2.26.1 was replaced. Next was the problems with chase.com which is
holding me at the 2.30 level in hopes that the next release will
eliminate this problem that makes 2.31 unacceptable. How much longer
can this go on?
The current firefox user interface is also unacceptable to me. Is
there a way to port the seamonkey user interface in place of the
firefox interface? If so, I might give serious consideration to
moving to firefox and thunderbird in place of seamonkey.
I would prefer to have seamonkey working as it did in 2.26.1 with all
the current security fixed applied, but I have my doubts if this will
ever be available. For some reason the developers are more interested
in adding "features" than in fixing problems.
Dave
Why not use SM 2.26.1 instead?
For one it is vulnerable to [RSA Signature Forgery in NSS —
Mozilla](https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2014-73/)
and probably [1076983 – (POODLE) Padding oracle attack on SSL
3.0](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=poodle)
Not to mention all the other security vulnerabilities fixed since the
release of 2.26.1.
[Security Advisories for SeaMonkey —
Mozilla](https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/known-vulnerabilities/seamonkey/)
But David already mentioned "I would prefer to have seamonkey working as
it did in 2.26.1 with all the current security fixed applied,"
Thanks Walt. I missed the part about wanting security fixes.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
