WaltS48 wrote:
On 03/03/2015 02:00 AM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 03/03/15 04:38, Ed Mullen wrote:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 3/2/2015 12:29 PM:
FF equivalent to SM 2.26.1 ?
Hi, can someone tell me the FF equivalent to SM 2.26.1 ?
Thanks.
29
I normally determine the FF equivalent of SM by adding the bits of the
SM version and then adding one, e.g. SM 2.26 ... 2 + 26 + 1 = 29
therefore SM 2.26 is equivalent to FF 29
Don't know how the extra bit works in ... maybe SM 2.26.1 is
equivalent to FF 29.1 and SM 2.27 (if there was one) would have been
equivalent to FF 30.
Interesting! I found a chart at Mozilla listing the products.
Installed FF 27 on one laptop tonight.
Removed FF 29.
I agree with Geoff. May install 28.xx on another laptop tomorrow
Then eventually SM 2.23 or so on this machine.
SeaMonkey 2.23 is over a year old, having been released on 2013-12-12.
I would install SM 2.32. It has all the security vulnerabilities fixed
that your Firefox is vulnerable to.
[Security Advisories for Firefox —
Mozilla](https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox/)
[Security Advisories for SeaMonkey —
Mozilla](https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/known-vulnerabilities/seamonkey/)
Thanks Walt.
I like the interface of FF27 but not so much FF29.
Is the interface of SM 2.25 much different from SM 3x.x?
From what I have read, each new version takes away more user control.
I'm not too concerned about security.
This old XP3 and SM1119 machine has never gotten a virus in
its 10 years of XP incarnations and hardware upgrades.
The two w7 machines with everything are always getting nasty
stuff even though they are only used for work and supposedly secure.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
