stango wrote: > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> That's irrelevant to this discussion so far. Bluefish isn't related to >> Composer or BlueGriffon at all. It is an entirely different kind of >> tool. (I know; I use Bluefish.) >> > If you looked at my web site first glance you would not be able to tell > what I used to create it and most people will not care. Because I know > how to write code I decided that I do not need CSS to create it.
It was quite easy to tell what you used. :-) <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Mozilla/4.79 [en] (WinNT; U) [Netscape]"> > Your are all hooked up on what Composer will not do for you instead of > learning how to write HTML code yourself. With a book and a text editor > you can write code to support any function you need. Sorry, but you are wrong. I have been hand-coding web sites since 1997. No generators. No WYSIWYG tools. Just an editor (but a good one). > To answer your question, yes I know what CSS is, yes I know what HTML5 > is and discovered that I do not need either to build a web site that > conveys exactly what I want it to without a lot of gimmicky code which > adds no value to me or to the person that visits my site. Sure, your 1990s code may work just fine for you. In fact, your site is okay. No flashy annoying stuff (except for the waving flags). I think it's a reasonably nice site .. just that old style may not meet the needs of the OP. You could consider using includes so your menu is on every page, which would eliminate having to return to the home page to find another. That would be a nice update. > To steer back to the original point of the discussion, Composer is far > easier to use and create WYSIWYG HTML pages than Blue Griffon is. We'll have to agree to disagree on that. > This is my last comment on this subject...... Then this shall be mine as well. -- -bts -This space for rent, but the price is high _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
