Daniel wrote:
On 8/07/2015 5:55 AM, John Duncan wrote:
<Snip>
To fix this,
couldn't we try always reporting the Firefox/x.x bit at the end of the
UA string to deal with invalid sniffing? or is that not the issue in
this circumstance?
Yes, you could, John, but then no-one will ever know about SM!! So you
might as well just use FF!
Ha, that is a good point! This doesn't really seem like a big issue
anyway. I have yet to come across a website that denies me access based
on the fact that I'm advertising SeaMonkey instead of Firefox. The
``chrome-optimised'' websites on the other hand... *shudders*
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
