Richard Owlett wrote:
As an end user, I would like to see it kept as long as possible. It allows me create simple HTML pages for use on my own machine.
I take a similar approach. I do some documentation in HTML, and I really like the capacity of viewing an HTML document in Seamonkey, and pressing ctrl-E to edit it. My one complaint is that the composer turns out sloppy HTML.
However, knowing that the composer is not officially supported, I tend to use the stand-alone Kompozer (even though it's no longer supported), with the hopes that the HTML might be a little cleaner, but I think there's minimal difference. I've also played with Blue Griffon, but there's just enough quirks in the UI (and even then, I'm not sure that the HTML is cleaner), and I think I'm probably going to go back to using the Seamonkey composer, as long as it's available.
That said, I do recognize FRG's point that Mozilla's architectural changes may make it impossible to keep the composer. And I agree that mail/news takes developer priority.
Smith _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
